Saturday, October 12, 2019
The Existence of a Monopoly and Public Interest Essay -- Monopolies Ec
The Existence of a Monopoly and Public Interest    A monopoly is defined as the sole supplier of a good or service with  no close substitutes in a given price range. A pure monopoly will  therefore have a 100% market share i.e. the firm is the industry. They  exist and can only remain as monopolies if there are high barriers to  entry to the industry. In the case of a natural monopoly, economies of  scale are so large that any new entrant would find it impossible to  match the costs and prices of the established firm in the industry.  Other barriers to entry include legal barriers such as patents,  natural cost advantages such as ownership of all key sites in the  industry, marketing barriers such as advertising, and restrictive  practises designed to force any competition to leave the market. In  this market structure it is also assumed profits are maximised and  there is consumer rationality.    Traditionally monopoly is thought to be a potentially harmful market  structure with unwelcome consequences for the consumer and the  economy. Competition has always therefore been seen to be desirable.  It could be said therefore to be against the public interest. However  there are arguments not only against monopolies but also for their  existence.    One of the main arguments against monopolies is that they raise  prices, restrict output and therefore exploit consumers. This is  because the neo-classical theory of the firm assumes that a monopolist  will maximise profits which means it will produce where MC=MR. The  equilibrium profit maximising level of output will therefore be where  MC-MR. This is shown below:    The diagram above shows the firm will produce the quantity Qe and will  charge the price Pe. As the monopolist above is...              ...s to large  firms in the economy. Should it split them up or promote such firms.  Competition policy therefore reflects the attitude towards monopoly.  At the moment the UK has a pragmatic approach where monopoly can be  good or bad. I t uses the monopolies and mergers commission to use a  case-by-case approach. Competition policy is a government policy to  influence the degree of competition in individual markets within the  economy. Governments can also attempt to correct market failure caused  by monopolies by taxing supernormal profit away, set maximum price  levels, subsidise production, nationalise the industry, break it up or  reduce entry barriers.    In the past economists have generally come out against monopolies and  in favour of competitive markets. However, this is clearly not  conclusive as monopolies have many potential advantages and  disadvantages.                      The Existence of a Monopoly and Public Interest Essay --  Monopolies Ec  The Existence of a Monopoly and Public Interest    A monopoly is defined as the sole supplier of a good or service with  no close substitutes in a given price range. A pure monopoly will  therefore have a 100% market share i.e. the firm is the industry. They  exist and can only remain as monopolies if there are high barriers to  entry to the industry. In the case of a natural monopoly, economies of  scale are so large that any new entrant would find it impossible to  match the costs and prices of the established firm in the industry.  Other barriers to entry include legal barriers such as patents,  natural cost advantages such as ownership of all key sites in the  industry, marketing barriers such as advertising, and restrictive  practises designed to force any competition to leave the market. In  this market structure it is also assumed profits are maximised and  there is consumer rationality.    Traditionally monopoly is thought to be a potentially harmful market  structure with unwelcome consequences for the consumer and the  economy. Competition has always therefore been seen to be desirable.  It could be said therefore to be against the public interest. However  there are arguments not only against monopolies but also for their  existence.    One of the main arguments against monopolies is that they raise  prices, restrict output and therefore exploit consumers. This is  because the neo-classical theory of the firm assumes that a monopolist  will maximise profits which means it will produce where MC=MR. The  equilibrium profit maximising level of output will therefore be where  MC-MR. This is shown below:    The diagram above shows the firm will produce the quantity Qe and will  charge the price Pe. As the monopolist above is...              ...s to large  firms in the economy. Should it split them up or promote such firms.  Competition policy therefore reflects the attitude towards monopoly.  At the moment the UK has a pragmatic approach where monopoly can be  good or bad. I t uses the monopolies and mergers commission to use a  case-by-case approach. Competition policy is a government policy to  influence the degree of competition in individual markets within the  economy. Governments can also attempt to correct market failure caused  by monopolies by taxing supernormal profit away, set maximum price  levels, subsidise production, nationalise the industry, break it up or  reduce entry barriers.    In the past economists have generally come out against monopolies and  in favour of competitive markets. However, this is clearly not  conclusive as monopolies have many potential advantages and  disadvantages.                        
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.