Summary Of Dinner Party Economics Written By Eveline

In this report, we will be taking a look in Dinner Party Economics written by Eveline Adomait and Richard Maranta. Specifically, we will be looking at Chapters eleven and twelve; Macroeconomic policy and inevitable political debate. Hello its me gka d shk gd h gd hj gusg Let us first dive into chapter eleven about macroeconomic policy. The big picture in this chapter is that policy matters. Some big questions and ideas we should have from this chapter are: 1) Who is in charge?-â€Å"what can a government do (if anything) to change its country’s economic circumstances? What are the tools of the trade, so to speak?† (page 146) 2) What is your problem? Before we even think about what policies are in effect and should be in effect for certain†¦show more content†¦It considers how we can measure the economy and the ways to do so. When evaluating our problem, we must take in mind the measure of what is at stake. We conduct measurements of the economy and all that we need to be able to get the full picture and get the absolute best information to make the best and most accurate decision. From that step, it will give us a clearer picture of whether we should take the ‘wait and see’ step or the ‘at your discretion’ step. One final things that connects to the subject of policy is what is in chapter four. Chapter four talks about money as the main topic. What interested me is the conversation between the students at the beginning of the chapter (page 27). Money is such a general thing that can be looked at, spent and used in so many different ways. Even a group of similar people (students in university), can have such different ideas of money because of the way they live, grew up and were taught and handled money. Many policies involve money. If so many people have such different ideals when it comes to money, are policies fair? Well I guess you could look at that question as one of the roles of policy. To bring fairness to the economy. Now to jump into chapter twelve; inevitable political debate. There a truly going to be endless and infinite amounts of political debates for as long as we shall live here on this earth. Everyone one has an opinion, especially when it comes to society,

The Charges Against Socrates Essay - 640 Words

The Charges Against Socrates The charges against Socrates were brought upon him by a man names Meletus. Meletus was a young man that Socrates did not know very well. These charges brought on by Meletus caused the indictment of Socrates. One of the charges in the affidavit written by Meletus against Socrates is that he is corrupting the youth. Another charge that is brought upon Socrates is that of he is making up new Gods and disregarding the old Gods the Athenians believe in. These were the charges brought on Socrates. Socrates starts his defense by addressing the jury and telling them that his accusers had a prepared speech, while Socrates speech will be completely improvised. Socrates continued to further disassociate†¦show more content†¦Towards the end of Socrates defense he states, They enjoy hearing these being questioned who think they are wise, but are not. Socrates is telling the jury that he has been honest with them and that he does not corrupt the youth, the youth and others follow him around for the reason in quotations. This was Socrates defense. If I were a juror in this trial I would plan to vote note guilty. The basis of my decision would be simple. In Socrates defense speech he is clear in his arguments, and I was thoroughly convinced when he cross examined Meletus and cornered him on many areas of his charges against Socrates. An example of this is when Socrates says, All Athenians, it seems, make the young into fine and good men, except me, and I alone corrupt t hem. Is that what you mean? -- That is most definitely what I mean. Socrates then goes and counter attacks by asking Meletus if this also applies to other animals. Socrates asks if all men improve horses and only one person corrupts them. Socrates ends this small argument by saying You have made it sufficiently obvious, Meletus, that you have never had any concern for our youth; you show your indifference clearly; that you have given no thought to the subjects about which you bring me to trial. This quote from the text obviously shows that Meletus does notShow MoreRelatedWhat Are The Charges Against Socrates?1019 Words   |  5 PagesOctober 2015 What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? Why or why not? The Apology is assumed to be the most realistic account that has been conserved of Socrates defense of himself as it was presented before the Athenian Council. It is in essential agreement with the references to the trial that occur in Plato s other dialogs. We may determine that Apology is not written by Socrates and only contains the words of Socrates that were memorized by PlatoRead MoreA Just Man Should Fear No Death in the Apology by Plato Essay825 Words   |  4 Pagesby Plato, and relates Socrates’ defense at his trial on charges of corrupting the youth and impiety. Socrates argues that he is innocent of both charges. His defense is ultimately unsuccessful, and he is convicted and sentenced to death. Socrates concludes the Apology by arguing that a just man should have no fear of death. Socrates defends himself against the charges brought against him by his prosecutor Meletus in two ways. One way consists of a description of Socrates’ motivation and methodRead MoreSocrates’ Speech in Apology975 Words   |  4 Pagesbe read as a warning to Socrates. Aristophanes is a â€Å"friendly critic† of Socrates and warns Socrates to change his ways for Athens and for the good of himself (Whidden). Plato’s Symposium and especially his Apology of Socrates justify the claims made in Clouds about the dangers of philosophy and Socrates to the public, even if Plato’s Socrates is less exaggeratedly hubristic than the Socrates in Clouds. Socrates takes the warning from the Clouds seriously. In Socrates’ speech in Apology, heRead MoreSocrates Method of Cross-Examine Essay example1392 Words   |  6 Pagesargue that Socrates does not typically benefit those that he cross-examines, but that his activity is nonetheless useful and justified. I will argue that Socrates’ cross-examinations are justified and useful because it is a divine mission and because it develops critical thinking skills. I will argue my thesis by first, using The Apology and Euthyphro dialogues to show the usefulness and justification of Socrates’ elenchus. Second, I will suggest objections to the reasons why Socrates’ elenchus isRead MoreEssay on Platos Apology932 Words   |  4 Pagesof seventy, Socrates found himself fighting against an indictment of impiety. He was unsuccessful at trial in the year 399 B.C. The charges were corrupting the youth of Athens, not believing in the traditional gods in whom the city believ ed, and finally, that he believed in other new divinities. In Platos Apology, Socrates defends himself against these charges. He claims that the jurors opinions are biased because they had probably all seen Aristophanes comedy The Clouds. The Socrates portrayedRead MoreApology Paper1168 Words   |  5 PagesRichard March 15, 2013 Apology Paper In Apology by Plato, Socrates, who is convicted and sentenced to death by the jury of Athenian citizens, not only pleads his innocence, but also expresses his opinion on democracy. The speeches and dialogues Socrates makes in this book raises a question for the reader whether the jury of Athenian citizens is justified in convicting Socrates and condemning him to death. Although Socrates believes that he is innocent, the jury has justification. It is myRead MoreAn Unexamined Life Of Socrates1199 Words   |  5 Pages An Unexamined Life Lyndsey Emry PHIL 1381-17 Introduction to Philosophy Professor Bannister When studying Socrates, you the reader must come up with your point of view and take what Socrates is trying to teach into your own approach. You must also think why Socrates choose the words he choose. Socrates careful choice of words give much color to his quote, â€Å"an unexamined life is no life for a human being to live.† The word examined for example has many definitions, including: toRead MoreSocrates : Not Guilty1610 Words   |  7 PagesSocrates: Not Guilty Intro (138) In 399 BC, when he was seventy years old, Socrates was called into court by three men: Meletus, a poet, Anytus, a politician, and Lycon, an orator. The specific charges were impiety (namely that he did not believe in the gods of Athens, and instead had introduced new gods), and corruption of the youth of the city. The account of Socrates’ trial is preserved in the Apology by Plato, a dialogue that ought not to be considered a verbatim report of Socrates’ defenseRead MoreSocrates, Guilty Or Not Essay946 Words   |  4 PagesSocrates, Guilty Or Not Ancient Athens was the site of a growing culture. Philosophy was among the many improvements and discoveries being made. With these improvements and discoveries, great thinkers were able to stretch out their knowledge to new heights. The society they lived in, both welcomed and shunned their ideals. Socrates was one of these thinkers. It was because of Socrates open-mindedness that he was sentenced to death by two charges brought against him. One, Socrates corrupted theRead More Argument in the Apology Essay897 Words   |  4 Pagesphilosopher Plato is whether, notorious speaker and philosopher Socrates is corrupting the youth by preaching ungodly theories and teaching them unlawful ideas that do harm to individuals and society. In his words Socrates quoted the prosecution’s accusation against him: â€Å"Socrates is guilty of corrupting the minds of the young, and of believing in supernatural things of his own invention instead of the gods recognized by the state.† 1 F urther Socrates consistently introduces tediously compiled number of examples

Compare and Contrast Essay- Speak Free Essays

These themes are very prevalent with the man in Not Waving But Drowning by Steve Smith and with Melinda from Speak by Laurie Hales Anderson. In the novel Speak, the mall character, Melinda Sordid has many tough problems to face. Sometimes, she chooses not to ask for help, but merely hang back and let It pass her by. We will write a custom essay sample on Compare and Contrast Essay- Speak or any similar topic only for you Order Now After a while, her problems almost swallow her whole. She gets the help she needs when she acts well enough to deserve it again. However, in Not Waving But Drowning, the man did not treat people very well, did not deserve help, and did not et it. He lost his battle against the world and took his own life. In both cases, the choices you make decide whether or not you get the help that you need. The man from Not Waving But Drowning, whom will be called George for the time being, and Melinda Cordons seem to have many things In common. But there are some key differences between them. For one, Melinda lives through her pain. By the end of her story, she has gotten help and is well on the Journey of rediscovering herself, however, George was not so lucky. George was known for messing with people and being a prankster. Even though this could’ve been a defense mechanism, George may have brought his tragic death or pain on himself. Whether or not George actually died or he Just had extreme depression and pain In his heart from the world is not clear, but he clearly Is not able to deal with the amount of pain that he Is dealing with. A major difference between Melinda and George would be that one lived through their painful ordeal and one did not. Another major difference between Melinda and George would be suicide. By the ay that Not Waving But Drowning implies that it was â€Å"too cold for his heart to handle†, George sounds dead. The cause of death being the fact that his heart couldn’t handle the cold, but not literally. This means that he couldn’t take the pain, and ended his own life. Melinda, however, only made one attempt at cutting her wrists with paperclips. In fact, after that being her all time low, she picked herself back up and found her own strength in her flaws. The matter of suicide is another difference that Melinda and George have. There is, however, one major similarity that George and Melinda have. Nobody saw his or her cries for help. For George, â€Å"Nobody heard him, but still he lay a Joke because he loved â€Å"larking† or messing around. Melanin’s cries for help were written off as well, such as when she cried on Christmas, her sudden drop in social skills, grades, and an effort at life. They are clearly cries for help when it is realized that she longs for a friend, no matter how much she pushes people away. Melinda and George Just want some help but nobody recognizes it. The help you get depends on how you treat others and whether or not you deserve it. George and Melinda treat people in certain ways. George treats everything like a Joke, therefore his cries for help and pain is written off as a Joke. Melinda treats people as awfully as she feels inside. One mistake made her from a normal carefree girl to who she is in most of the novel Speak. Her mistake does not make her unworthy of help, so she gets it. No matters how long it takes, better late than never, help with come to those who deserve it. How to cite Compare and Contrast Essay- Speak, Essays

Compare and Contrast Essay- Speak Free Essays

These themes are very prevalent with the man in Not Waving But Drowning by Steve Smith and with Melinda from Speak by Laurie Hales Anderson. In the novel Speak, the mall character, Melinda Sordid has many tough problems to face. Sometimes, she chooses not to ask for help, but merely hang back and let It pass her by. We will write a custom essay sample on Compare and Contrast Essay- Speak or any similar topic only for you Order Now After a while, her problems almost swallow her whole. She gets the help she needs when she acts well enough to deserve it again. However, in Not Waving But Drowning, the man did not treat people very well, did not deserve help, and did not et it. He lost his battle against the world and took his own life. In both cases, the choices you make decide whether or not you get the help that you need. The man from Not Waving But Drowning, whom will be called George for the time being, and Melinda Cordons seem to have many things In common. But there are some key differences between them. For one, Melinda lives through her pain. By the end of her story, she has gotten help and is well on the Journey of rediscovering herself, however, George was not so lucky. George was known for messing with people and being a prankster. Even though this could’ve been a defense mechanism, George may have brought his tragic death or pain on himself. Whether or not George actually died or he Just had extreme depression and pain In his heart from the world is not clear, but he clearly Is not able to deal with the amount of pain that he Is dealing with. A major difference between Melinda and George would be that one lived through their painful ordeal and one did not. Another major difference between Melinda and George would be suicide. By the ay that Not Waving But Drowning implies that it was â€Å"too cold for his heart to handle†, George sounds dead. The cause of death being the fact that his heart couldn’t handle the cold, but not literally. This means that he couldn’t take the pain, and ended his own life. Melinda, however, only made one attempt at cutting her wrists with paperclips. In fact, after that being her all time low, she picked herself back up and found her own strength in her flaws. The matter of suicide is another difference that Melinda and George have. There is, however, one major similarity that George and Melinda have. Nobody saw his or her cries for help. For George, â€Å"Nobody heard him, but still he lay a Joke because he loved â€Å"larking† or messing around. Melanin’s cries for help were written off as well, such as when she cried on Christmas, her sudden drop in social skills, grades, and an effort at life. They are clearly cries for help when it is realized that she longs for a friend, no matter how much she pushes people away. Melinda and George Just want some help but nobody recognizes it. The help you get depends on how you treat others and whether or not you deserve it. George and Melinda treat people in certain ways. George treats everything like a Joke, therefore his cries for help and pain is written off as a Joke. Melinda treats people as awfully as she feels inside. One mistake made her from a normal carefree girl to who she is in most of the novel Speak. Her mistake does not make her unworthy of help, so she gets it. No matters how long it takes, better late than never, help with come to those who deserve it. How to cite Compare and Contrast Essay- Speak, Essays

Roosevelts Conservation And Consumer Protection Essays -

Roosevelt's Conservation and Consumer Protection President Theodore Roosevelt and the progressives made their greatest success in the fields of conservation and consumer protection. Not many people would stand against them, making them successful. Roosevelt stood against greater opposition on the other progressive issues that could have been more prosperous, yet were not so widely accepted. Conservation did have problems, for Roosevelt and Pinchot both believed that the resources of the nation should be used wisely. Pinchot believed that wilderness was waste. However Theodore Roosevelt realized that one of the nations resources that had to be saved for posterity was wilderness. He helped organize national parks that still exist today, such as Yosemite National Park. Muir of the Sierra Club believed in this in a ?spare-that-tree? way and stood against the Hetch Hetchy dam affair that Pinchot supported. This controversy is still debatable to this date. After loosing his stomach for sausage due to reading Upton Sinclair's The Jungle, Theodore Roosevelt helped to spur the National Food and Drug Association, and meat packing inspection. Relatively few people would argue with meat packing inspection regulations after being introduced to conditions described by Sinclair's muckraking. Muckraking helped to alert the people of the country of corruption all around them. Although its content would be treated like the scandal reveling investigative reporting seen today, it played a crucial role in the safety of many people. Theodore Roosevelt read The Jungle proving its value for all meat consumers to read and soon find meat unpalatable.

Journeys End R C Sherriff Essay Essays

Journeys End R C Sherriff Essay Essays Journeys End R C Sherriff Essay Essay Journeys End R C Sherriff Essay Essay Essay Topic: Literature In Journeys End R C Sherriff skilfully orchestrates a complex pattern of tensions. Trace the development of these at key moments showing how they are dramatically effective. Journeys End was written by R C Sherriff, and is set in a trench during the First World War. The way Sherriff structures this piece of work, is very unusual as it does not stick to one kind of atmosphere, he switches between pathos, humour and many different types of tension. It is a clever the way he manages to write so many tensions into his work, as the background to the story is The War. The plays main characters create these tensions by the way they act around each other, they are; Stanhope, the Companies commander in chief, but still despite this ranking he is still nothing better and a tall, slimly built boy with broad shoulders, he is never without a high percentage of alcohol in his bloodstream and is hiding something from the others, below the surface of his skin, as we are told by Osborne when he speaks something happened, I am unsure of what it was, a silly little argument, when suddenly he jumped to his feet and knocked the table over, the glasses spilled. He lost all control over himself and then suddenly he came round and cried real tears. Osborne, Uncle to the company members was second in command, just as capable and a lot older than Stanhope. Although he does not like to admit the fact that he is just as capable, it is out of pure loyalty to Stanhope and the amount of lovingness that he holds for Stanhope as we see, when he defends Stanhope in a discussion, He is called a drunkard, just because he has stuck it out until his nerves have been battered to bits. The new member of the company is Stanhopes fianci s little brother and an old school chum of Stanhopes. Upon entering the play Raleigh is seen to be extremely nervous, as he does what is asked instantly and says very little. We also have Hardy; an extremely selfish man, who refuses to care about the companys men, Hibbert; shown to be very scared of war and is faking an injury just so he can leave the battlefields, and of course Trotter; Stanhopes second lieutenant, can eat like a horse, short, fat and middle aged, who seems to care not about the war where people are dieing but the war that is raging within his stomach. There is no real tension in the plays opening few pages, but with the introduction of Raleigh; the new boy in the company comes the first area of real tension, upon his first encounter with Stanhope. Raleigh is anticipating their first meeting with great expectations, but this is not what he receives. Stanhope introduces himself with a special glee in his voice, but when Raleigh removes himself from the shadows, there is a slight pause and the glee that Stanhope once spoke with quickly vanished and his voice changed, for the worse. But even before he has noticed that his new under study is Raleigh he demands a bottle of whiskey, much to the misfortune of Raleigh as he begins to see what the war has turned Stanhope into. From the moment they met in the trench until the moment they become deceased Stanhope has a major cloud over his head, in the fact that when Raleigh decides to write home, he may tell his sister about the new Stanhope. The fact that Stanhope used to be unable to drink any form of alcohol only crops up later on in the play, when he has a drunken conversation with Osborne. Upon Raleighs decision to write home and inform his family how he is coping with life on the front line, is where Sherriff brings in his next area of a tension filled play. It is impossible to predict what he will or would have written as it is not revealed until later on in the play, Sherriff leaves a number of avenues of thought open for his audience but gives no hint as which one to take. The only hint given as to which way to go, is when Sherriff takes the tension to another level, Raleigh enquires what he is to do about writing home, Stanhope informs him of what to do and then adds a new rule which was the fact that all letters were to be read by the companies commander in chief. Raleigh stutters and tells Stanhope that it no longer matters, he will not be writing home. Of course Raleighs refusal to write home, even though the letter was clutched in his fist, for everybody to see, sends Stanhope and Sherriffs audience down the road that he has written all the bad things he has seen in Stanhope since his arrival in the trench. That was the last straw for an already tipsy Stanhope, as he rises to his feet and screams at Raleigh to hand the letter over to him, even though Raleigh claimed there was nothing written in the letter about Stanhope. The letter is taken from Raleigh by Stanhope and given orders to leave the room, in the description given by Sherriff, the audience is left with no doubt that Raleigh is gravely disappointed with the man he once saw as his hero. When the letter is torn open by Stanhope, he breaks down and says he is unable to read the words that may have been spoken, so Osborne offers to read it to him. Both Stanhope and the tension are relieved when Osborne informs him, that there is nothing but his good side written about, how he is said to be the finest officer in the battalion, by far the hardest worker and how proud he is to be known as one of Stanhopes best friends. After the completion of the passage, the lowered heads can only point to one ting and that is pure and utter shame upon Stanhope and he begins to look at himself in a different light from that point onwards. The next feeling of real tension only involves Stanhope and the want away officer Hibbert. Hibbert claims to be suffering from an in diagnosable disease called Neuralgia. The play makes you think that Hibbert is making it up about him having contracted the disease, as he has spoken of his discontent of not being allowed sick leave. When Hibbert moans about his sickness to Stanhope, he dismisses it without thought and says it nothing. Hibbert thinks that he has a good chance of getting away from the war as one officer has been sent home with the same disease, but no matter how hard he pressed he was still told No. The subject of Hibbert and his disease is dropped and only returned to when the big attack is nearing its date. Stanhope and Hibbert are left alone and Hibbert re-opens the subject and begins to get into hysterics, and also begins to lose his temper with Stanhope. But the tension has yet to reach its peak and only does so when Stanhope shows him that he is willing to shoot him, but instead he gives him half a minute to decide whether to stay and fight, with his dignity in tact or desert and die and Hibbert becomes so angry ad frustrated that he lashes out at Stanhope and hits him across the face. Stanhope then threatens to have a Court Marshall put in place but does Hibbert a deal, he says if you stay and fight I will not bring in a Court Marshall, your half a second is up. What will it be? There is no need for the answer to be written in words for the play, the choice is made and Hibbert stays. The tension is only eased once Hibbert breaks down in Stanhopes arms. Although we have reached the highest level we reach in words of tension, Sherriff still manages to find more room in this play for, yet again more tension. This is of course, the raid of a German trench. Raleigh and Osborne lead the attack with ten other officers from their battalion. We come across a conversation between the Colonel and Stanhope, but the Colonel seems less than interested in the mens safety as he sees the raid as just a game. After the conversation is over, we have a real moment of huge pressure and of course the tension, this is the last few minutes before that big event in a persons life that they are really fired up and burning inside to do. Raleigh asks Osborne for the time and it is time to go. They stage directions say as they walk up and into the trenches, with the pale evening sun leaving just a silhouette of their bodies. There is no description of the raid, which is a very vital moment in the play, and is done to keep the audience on the edge of their seats and guessing as to what will happen next. Six men and Uncle died in the raid but this is only found out once the Colonel has remembered the regiments name and how many were in the raiding party. The tension ends instantly and with no hesitation the celebrations began. Celebrations fill the immediate aftermath, but without doubt the tension rises when Raleigh refuses to eat or drink any sort of substance. The reason for this is because Osborne has just died in the raid and he feels like nobody around him cares. Another factor in his decision is the fact that he is very inexperienced and young at heart, and nothing like this has ever happened before to him. Raleigh is order to leave by Stanhope, after and argument in which Stanhope without realising begins to shout at Raleigh for not enjoying himself, but Raleigh then begins to accuse Stanhope of not caring about the fact that one of his closest friends has just died, and he has not been happy with Raleigh being there from the very beginning, Stanhope struggles to find his breath and the order is blared at Raleigh with no hesitation, which cancels out the tension that was in the room. The big attack is upon the battalion and Hibbert once again is resenting the fact that he has to go up into the trench and fight. He has a very pale and unwell complexion at this point, but tries to remove the fact of the attack by drinking glasses of water. He is one of the last men to reach the trench front as the sound of shells get increasingly louder and closer, but during the talk between Stanhope and himself, he comes round to the idea and walks up the stairs into the trench for the last time with a petit smile upon his brightening face. The title Journeys end only leads to one conclusion, the end of lifes journey. The tension never really left the play, and we are always reminded of it through the fact that there is a war on during the whole play. There is only one set for the whole play and that is the dugout where all of the acts and scenes take place. The tension embedded itself into the play and never leaves the story, but it only bubbles to the surface every so often. It is an excellently written play, as Sherriff manages to stitch tension, pathos and also the odd bit of humour into the play without, it ever getting to complex to understand.

Definition and Examples of Verbless Clauses in English

Definition and Examples of Verbless Clauses in English In English grammar, a verbless clause is a clause-like construction in which a verb element is implied but not present. Such clauses are usually adverbial, and the omitted verb is a form of be. Also known as a  free adjunct (or a free adjunct without a verbal form) and a nominal sentence. Examples and Observations Verbless clauses are clauses which contain no verb element, and often also no subject. They are regarded as clauses because they function in ways which make them equivalent to finite and non-finite clauses and because they can be analyzed in terms of one or more clause elements. (Geoffroy Leech and Jan Svartvik, A Communicative Grammar of English, 1975)A verbless clause . . . is considered a clause because it is dealing with a separate piece of information in relation to the main clause. For example, in the sentence, In the interests of the local children, the council should reconsider its decision, there are two separate pieces of information: the main clausethe council should reconsider its decision; and a dependent clause that deals with issues that interest local children. In this clause, however, the verb has been nominalized resulting in a verbless clause. Verbless clauses are different from adverbial phrases. The latter provide some information to do with the time, place, or m anner in which something happens within an existing clause. Verbless clauses, on the other hand, provide a separate piece of information outside of an existing clause. (Peter Knapp and Megan Watkins, Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. UNSW Press, 2005)